Kangen Water Scam: Debunking the Alkaline Hype

Kangen Water Scam: Debunking the Alkaline Hype

Introduction

In recent years, alkaline water has surged in popularity, with Kangen water emerging as one of the most prominent brands in this niche market. However, the term "Kangen water scam" has also gained traction as skeptics and experts alike question the validity of the health claims surrounding this product. This article aims to provide a comprehensive examination of Kangen water, its purported benefits, and the controversies surrounding its marketing and distribution.

Kangen water is a type of alkaline water produced by Enagic's water ionizer machines through a process called electrolysis. These devices claim to create water with a higher pH level, typically between 8.8 and 9.5, which proponents argue can offer various health benefits. However, it's crucial to note that these claims are not supported by robust scientific evidence. According to a review of available research, there is no strong scientific basis for the health benefits often attributed to alkaline water (Fenton & Huang, 2016).

The controversy surrounding Kangen water extends beyond just the product itself. Enagic, the company behind Kangen water, utilises a multi-level marketing (MLM) business model to distribute its products. This approach has drawn criticism from consumer advocates and regulatory bodies alike, raising questions about the legitimacy of both the product claims and the business opportunity presented to potential distributors. As we delve deeper into this topic, we'll explore the scientific analysis of alkaline water claims, regulatory issues, the MLM structure of Enagic, and expert opinions on the matter.

Introduction to Kangen Water and Enagic

What is Kangen Water?

Kangen water is a type of alkaline water produced by Enagic's water ionizer machines through a process called electrolysis. These devices claim to create water with a higher pH level, typically between 8.8 and 9.5. The term "Kangen" is derived from a Japanese word meaning "return to origin" (Fenton & Huang, 2016).

The electrolysis process used in Kangen water machines involves passing tap water over electrically charged plates. This process is said to separate the water into alkaline and acidic components. Proponents claim that drinking the alkaline water portion can provide various health benefits, though these claims are not supported by robust scientific evidence (Fenton & Huang, 2016).

It's important to note that while the electrolysis process does alter the pH of the water, it does not fundamentally change its molecular structure. Claims about "micro-clustering" or "hexagonal water" are not supported by established scientific principles of chemistry and physics (Lower, 2013).

About Enagic and Their Business Model

Enagic is a Japanese company founded in 1974 that manufactures and distributes Kangen water ionizer machines. The company operates using a multi-level marketing (MLM) business model, also known as network marketing. This approach has drawn significant criticism and scrutiny from consumer advocates and regulatory bodies (Koehn, 2001).

In Enagic's MLM structure, independent distributors purchase Kangen water machines at wholesale prices and then sell them to consumers at a markup. Distributors can also recruit other individuals to become distributors, earning commissions on their sales. This tiered structure is characteristic of MLM companies but has led to comparisons with pyramid schemes (Keep & Vander Nat, 2014).

Enagic offers several models of Kangen water machines, with prices ranging from approximately $1,000 to over $5,000. The high cost of these devices compared to conventional water filters has been a point of criticism, with some arguing that the MLM structure inflates prices unnecessarily (Vander Nat & Keep, 2002).

Scientific Analysis of Alkaline Water Claims

Lack of Evidence for Health Benefits

Despite the bold claims made by Kangen water proponents, there is a notable lack of robust scientific evidence supporting the purported health benefits of alkaline water. A comprehensive review of available research published in the Journal of Environmental and Public Health concluded that there is no evidence to support the use of alkaline water as a treatment for any health condition (Fenton & Huang, 2016).

The human body has sophisticated mechanisms to maintain a stable blood pH, typically between 7.35 and 7.45. Drinking alkaline water does not significantly alter this tightly regulated system. The stomach, in particular, produces hydrochloric acid that quickly neutralizes any alkaline substances consumed (Koufman & Johnston, 2012).

Major health organizations, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), have not endorsed alkaline water for any health benefits. The WHO's Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality state that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support the health claims associated with alkaline water (World Health Organization, 2017).

Debunking Common Alkaline Water Claims

Many of the health claims associated with Kangen water and other alkaline water products are not supported by scientific evidence. For example:

  1. Improved Hydration: A study published in the Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition found no significant difference in hydration levels between subjects who drank alkaline water versus regular water (Weidman et al., 2016).

  2. Detoxification: The human body has evolved sophisticated detoxification systems, primarily involving the liver and kidneys. There is no scientific evidence that alkaline water enhances these natural processes (Fenton & Huang, 2016).

  3. Disease Prevention: Claims that alkaline water can prevent or treat diseases like cancer are not supported by clinical evidence. A review in the journal Cancer Research found no credible evidence that manipulating pH levels could effectively treat cancer (Robey et al., 2009).

The Placebo Effect and Anecdotal Evidence

Many of the perceived benefits reported by Kangen water users may be attributed to the placebo effect. This psychological phenomenon can lead individuals to experience perceived improvements in their health or well-being simply because they believe a treatment will be effective (Finniss et al., 2010).

Anecdotal testimonials, while compelling, do not constitute reliable scientific evidence. Personal experiences can be influenced by numerous factors, including the placebo effect, confirmation bias, and natural fluctuations in health conditions. Controlled clinical trials are necessary to establish the efficacy of any health intervention (Greenhalgh, 2014).

It's crucial to approach health claims critically and seek information from reputable scientific sources. The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) provides guidelines for evaluating health claims and emphasizes the importance of evidence-based medicine (Therapeutic Goods Administration, 2020).

NaturoPress Alkaline Water Ionizer

Check out NaturoPress Alkaline Water Ionizer

Regulatory and Legal Issues

FDA Stance on Alkaline Water

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved alkaline water, including Kangen water, for any health claims or medical uses. The FDA regulates bottled water as a food product and has established standards for its safety and labeling. However, it does not recognize alkaline water as having any special health benefits beyond those of regular water (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2019).

In fact, the FDA has issued warning letters to several alkaline water companies for making illegal and unsubstantiated health claims. These warnings highlight the regulatory challenges faced by companies marketing alkaline water products (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2020).

FTC Actions Against Deceptive Marketing

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the United States has taken action against companies and individuals making deceptive health claims about alkaline water. The FTC's guidelines on health claims in marketing require that all claims be substantiated by competent and reliable scientific evidence (Federal Trade Commission, 2018).

In several cases, the FTC has issued cease and desist orders to MLM companies for making false or misleading claims about their products' health benefits. While Enagic itself has not been the subject of FTC action as of this writing, the regulatory scrutiny of the alkaline water industry highlights the potential legal risks for Kangen water distributors who make unsubstantiated health claims (Federal Trade Commission, 2019).

International Regulations

Regulations regarding alkaline water and health claims vary internationally. In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) regulates health claims on products and has strict guidelines for what can be claimed without scientific evidence. The TGA has not approved alkaline water for any therapeutic use (Therapeutic Goods Administration, 2020).

Similarly, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has rejected health claims related to alkaline water due to lack of scientific evidence. The EFSA's stance reinforces the global scientific consensus that alkaline water does not provide proven health benefits beyond those of regular water (European Food Safety Authority, 2016).

Analysis of Kangen Water's Multi-Level Marketing Structure

How Enagic's MLM Model Works

Enagic's multi-level marketing (MLM) model is central to its distribution strategy for Kangen water machines. In this system, independent distributors purchase machines at wholesale prices and then sell them to consumers at a markup. Distributors can also recruit other individuals to become distributors, earning commissions on their sales (Keep & Vander Nat, 2014).

The compensation plan is complex, with multiple levels and bonuses based on sales volume and recruitment. While some distributors may achieve significant earnings, research on MLMs consistently shows that the vast majority of participants do not make substantial income, and many lose money (Taylor, 2011).

Criticism of MLMs as Pyramid Schemes

MLMs like Enagic's have faced criticism for their similarity to pyramid schemes. While MLMs are legal in many countries, they often operate in a grey area. The primary concern is that the focus on recruitment over product sales can create an unsustainable business model that primarily benefits those at the top of the structure (Koehn, 2001).

A study published in the Federal Trade Commission Law Journal found that 99% of MLM participants lose money. This statistic raises serious questions about the viability of MLMs as a legitimate business opportunity for most participants (Bosley & McKeage, 2015).

The MLM Effect on Kangen Water Pricing

The MLM structure of Enagic's business model significantly impacts the pricing of Kangen water machines. The need to provide commissions at multiple levels of the distribution chain inflates the retail price of the machines well beyond their manufacturing cost (Vander Nat & Keep, 2002).

For example, while a high-quality conventional water filter might cost a few hundred dollars, Kangen water machines are priced at several thousand dollars. This price discrepancy is largely attributable to the MLM compensation structure rather than superior technology or efficacy (Vander Nat & Keep, 2002).

Pseudoscientific Claims About Kangen Water

Micro-Clustering and Hexagonal Water

One of the most prominent pseudoscientific claims associated with Kangen water is the concept of "micro-clustering" or "hexagonal water." Proponents argue that the electrolysis process creates smaller water molecule clusters that are more easily absorbed by the body. However, these claims violate fundamental principles of chemistry and physics (Lower, 2013).

Dr. Stephen Lower, a retired chemistry professor from Simon Fraser University, has extensively debunked these claims. He states, "The term 'micro-clustered water' is meaningless and is not recognized by the scientific community. It is a marketing ploy that has no basis in science" (Lower, 2013).

Misrepresentation of Electrolysis and pH

While electrolysis can indeed alter the pH of water, the benefits of this process are often misrepresented. The human body tightly regulates its pH levels, and drinking alkaline water does not significantly impact overall body pH. Moreover, the stomach's acidic environment quickly neutralizes any alkaline water consumed (Koufman & Johnston, 2012).

Dr. Tanis Fenton, an adjunct professor at the University of Calgary, states in her research, "There is no scientific evidence that alkaline water provides health benefits beyond those of regular water" (Fenton & Huang, 2016).

Hydrogen Water Claims

Some Kangen water proponents claim that their machines produce "hydrogen-rich" water with antioxidant properties. While there is emerging research on potential benefits of hydrogen-rich water, it's important to note that most Kangen machines are not specifically designed to produce significant amounts of dissolved hydrogen (Ohta, 2011).

Furthermore, the research on hydrogen water is still in its early stages, and more rigorous studies are needed to confirm any potential health benefits. It's crucial not to overstate or misrepresent preliminary research findings (Ohta, 2011).

Conclusion

After a comprehensive examination of the claims, scientific evidence, regulatory issues, and business practices surrounding Kangen water, it is clear that there are significant concerns about both the product itself and the way it is marketed and sold.

The lack of robust scientific evidence supporting the health claims made about Kangen water and alkaline water in general is perhaps the most glaring issue. Despite bold assertions about improved hydration, detoxification, and disease prevention, peer-reviewed research does not substantiate these benefits. Major health organizations like the World Health Organization and regulatory bodies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have not endorsed alkaline water for any health claims (World Health Organization, 2017; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2019). The human body's sophisticated pH regulation systems mean that drinking alkaline water is unlikely to significantly impact overall health in the ways often claimed by Kangen water proponents.

Furthermore, the multi-level marketing (MLM) structure employed by Enagic to distribute Kangen water machines raises serious ethical and financial concerns. Research consistently shows that the vast majority of participants in MLM schemes do not make substantial income, with many losing money (Taylor, 2011). The inflated pricing of Kangen water machines, largely attributable to the MLM compensation structure rather than superior technology, places a significant financial burden on consumers and distributors alike.

The pseudoscientific claims about "micro-clustering" and "hexagonal water" promoted by some Kangen water advocates have been thoroughly debunked by chemists and physicists. These concepts violate fundamental principles of chemistry and are not recognized by the scientific community (Lower, 2013). Such misleading claims only serve to confuse consumers and detract from evidence-based health practices.

In light of these findings, consumers should approach Kangen water and similar alkaline water products with a high degree of skepticism. While proper hydration is undoubtedly important for health, there is no compelling evidence that Kangen water offers benefits beyond those of regular, clean drinking water. Individuals concerned about their health should focus on well-established practices such as maintaining a balanced diet, regular exercise, and consulting with qualified healthcare professionals.

It is crucial for consumers to critically evaluate health claims, especially those associated with expensive products or business opportunities. The case of Kangen water serves as a reminder of the importance of scientific literacy and the need to seek information from reputable, peer-reviewed sources rather than marketing materials or anecdotal testimonials.

Regulatory bodies and consumer protection agencies should continue to scrutinize the alkaline water industry and multi-level marketing practices to ensure that consumers are not misled by unsubstantiated health claims or deceptive business opportunities. As always, when it comes to health and wellness, it is advisable to rely on evidence-based practices and the guidance of qualified medical professionals.

Key Highlights and Actionable Tips

• Kangen water is a type of alkaline water produced by Enagic's water ionizer machines, with claimed pH levels between 8.8 and 9.5.

• There is a lack of robust scientific evidence supporting the health claims made about Kangen water and alkaline water in general.

• Major health organisations like the WHO have not endorsed alkaline water for any health benefits.

• The human body tightly regulates its pH levels, and drinking alkaline water does not significantly impact overall body pH.

• Enagic uses a multi-level marketing (MLM) business model that has drawn criticism for its similarity to pyramid schemes.

• The MLM structure significantly inflates the retail price of Kangen water machines compared to conventional water filters.

• Claims about "micro-clustering" or "hexagonal water" are not scientifically valid and violate basic principles of chemistry.

• Consumers should approach Kangen water and similar alkaline water products with a high degree of scepticism.

• Focus on well-established health practices like a balanced diet, regular exercise, and consulting qualified healthcare professionals.

• Critically evaluate health claims, especially those associated with expensive products or business opportunities.

Is there any evidence that Kangen water can help with specific medical conditions?

While some proponents claim Kangen water can help with various medical conditions, there is currently no robust scientific evidence supporting its efficacy for treating or preventing any specific diseases. Controlled clinical trials would be needed to substantiate such claims. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional for medical advice rather than relying on unproven water treatments.

How does the cost of Kangen water machines compare to other water filtration systems?

Kangen water machines are significantly more expensive than most conventional water filtration systems, with prices ranging from approximately $1,000 to over $5,000. This price discrepancy is largely attributable to the multi-level marketing business model rather than superior technology. Consumers can find high-quality water filters for a fraction of the cost of Kangen machines.

Naturopress Alkline Water Machine

Check out Naturopress Alkline Water Machine

Are there any potential risks or side effects from drinking Kangen water?

While drinking Kangen water is generally not harmful for most healthy individuals, there are potential risks to consider. The high pH could potentially interfere with stomach acid and digestion in some people. Additionally, relying on Kangen water instead of seeking proper medical treatment for health issues could delay necessary care. As with any significant dietary change, it's advisable to consult a healthcare professional.

How does the Australian government regulate claims made about Kangen water?

In Australia, the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) regulates health claims on products and has strict guidelines for what can be claimed without scientific evidence. The TGA has not approved alkaline water for any therapeutic use. Companies making unsubstantiated health claims about Kangen water or similar products could potentially face regulatory action.

What alternatives exist for people interested in potential health benefits of water beyond regular tap water?

For those interested in potential health benefits beyond regular tap water, some evidence-based options include: 1. Ensuring adequate hydration with regular filtered water 2. Adding electrolytes to water for enhanced hydration, especially during intense exercise 3. Consuming water-rich fruits and vegetables for natural hydration and nutrients 4. Using a basic carbon filter to remove contaminants from tap water These approaches are generally more affordable and have stronger scientific backing than alkaline water systems.

References (Click to Expand)

Bosley, S., & McKeage, K. K. (2015). Multilevel Marketing Diffusion and the Risk of Pyramid Scheme Activity: The Case of Fortune Hi-Tech Marketing in Montana. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 34(1), 84-102.

European Food Safety Authority. (2016). Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to various food(s)/food constituent(s) and protection of cells from premature aging, antioxidant activity, antioxidant content and antioxidant properties, and protection of DNA, proteins and lipids from oxidative damage pursuant to Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006. EFSA Journal, 14(1), 4367.

Federal Trade Commission. (2018). Dietary Supplements: An Advertising Guide for Industry. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/tips-advice/business-center/guidance/dietary-supplements-advertising-guide-industry

Federal Trade Commission. (2019). FTC Sends Warning Letters to Companies Advertising Their CBD-Infused Products as Treatments for Serious Diseases, Including Cancer, Alzheimer's, and Multiple Sclerosis. Retrieved from https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2019/09/ftc-sends-warning-letters-companies-advertising-their-cbd-infused

Fenton, T. R., & Huang, T. (2016). Systematic review of the association between dietary acid load, alkaline water and cancer. BMJ Open, 6(6), e010438.

Finniss, D. G., Kaptchuk, T. J., Miller, F., & Benedetti, F. (2010). Biological, clinical, and ethical advances of placebo effects. The Lancet, 375(9715), 686-695.

Greenhalgh, T. (2014). How to read a paper: The basics of evidence-based medicine. John Wiley & Sons.

Keep, W. W., & Vander Nat, P. J. (2014). Multilevel marketing and pyramid schemes in the United States: An historical analysis. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 6(2), 188-210.

Koehn, D. (2001). Ethical issues connected with multi-level marketing schemes. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1-2), 153-160.

Koufman, J. A., & Johnston, N. (2012). Potential benefits of pH 8.8 alkaline drinking water as an adjunct in the treatment of reflux disease. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 121(7), 431-434.

Lower, S. (2013). "Ionized" and alkaline water: Snake oil on tap. Retrieved from http://www.chem1.com/CQ/ionbunk.html

Ohta, S. (2011). Recent progress toward hydrogen medicine: potential of molecular hydrogen for preventive and therapeutic applications. Current Pharmaceutical Design, 17(22), 2241-2252.

Robey, I. F., Baggett, B. K., Kirkpatrick, N. D., Roe, D. J., Dosescu, J., Sloane, B. F., ... & Gillies, R. J. (2009). Bicarbonate increases tumor pH and inhibits spontaneous metastases. Cancer Research, 69(6), 2260-2268.

Taylor, J. M. (2011). The case (for and) against multi-level marketing: The complete guide to understanding the flaws – and proving and countering the effects – of endless chain "opportunity" recruitment, or product-based pyramid schemes. Consumer Awareness Institute.

Therapeutic Goods Administration. (2020). Advertising health products (including medicines). Retrieved from https://www.tga.gov.au/advertising-health-products-including-medicines

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2019). Bottled Water Everywhere: Keeping it Safe. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/consumers/consumer-updates/bottled-water-everywhere-keeping-it-safe

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2020). Warning Letters. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/compliance-actions-and-activities/warning-letters

Vander Nat, P. J., & Keep, W. W. (2002). Marketing fraud: An approach for differentiating multilevel marketing from pyramid schemes. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(1), 139-151.

Weidman, J., Holsworth, R. E., Brossman, B., Cho, D. J., St Cyr, J., & Fridman, G. (2016). Effect of electrolyzed high-pH alkaline water on blood viscosity in healthy adults. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 13(1), 45.

World Health Organization. (2017). Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. World Health Organization.

Back to blog